ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Clinical and Histological Comparison of Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Periodontal Dressing and Non-Eugenol Periodontal Dressing Alone on the Depigmented Gingival Epithelium.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analgesic effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A systematic review.Periodontology 2000 · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to assess and contrast the healing results, in terms of both histology and clinical appearance, after gingival depigmentation using diode laser application of the platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane in contrast to non-eugenol periodontal dressing (Coe-Pak). Materials and Method: Thirty individuals in good health, aged between 18 and 50 years, were randomly divided into two groups, with each group consisting of 15 participants. One group underwent application of a PRF membrane along with periodontal dressing, while the other group received solely non-eugenol periodontal dressing. This procedure was performed in the intercanine region of the maxillary or mandibular arch for all participants. PRF was processed following the standardized procedure outlined by Choukroun. Patients underwent assessments for pain intensity using the visual analog scale (VAS) and for healing advancement using the Healing Index (HI) on the third and fifth days following treatment. Results: Statistically significant disparities were noted between the two study groups concerning the VAS, HI, epithelialization assessment, and histological observations. In the clinical assessment of epithelialization using toluidine blue, it was observed that areas treated with PRF+Coe-Pak showed significantly reduced staining, indicating enhanced wound healing compared to those treated with Coe-Pak alone. Conclusion: After depigmentation, the PRF+Coe-Pak group demonstrated enhanced patient comfort and facilitated an efficient wound-healing process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.