Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926866›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024

Probing the Clinical, Laboratory, and Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Malaria: A Case-Control Study.

Ritesh Upadhyay, Annasaheb J Dhumale, Chanchlesh Dehariya, Renu Waghmare, Amit Rangari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ritesh UpadhyayDepartment of Community Medicine, Chhindwara Institute of Medical Sciences, Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Annasaheb J DhumaleDepartment of General Medicine, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapith, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Chanchlesh DehariyaDepartment of Pathology, Chhindwara Institute of Medical Sciences, Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Renu WaghmareDepartment of Community Medi1cine, Virendra Kumar Sakhlecha Government medical College, Neemuch, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Amit RangariDepartment of Microbiology, Nandkumar Singh Chouhan Government Medical College, Khandwa, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The National Malaria Elimination Program (NMEP) has helped reduce the mortality from malaria in India, and there are alarmingly high mortality rates from anemia in certain geographical regions. Aim: To assess the clinical, laboratory, and sociodemographic factors associated with malaria from P. falciparum and P. vivax. Methods: This retrospective record-based clinical study subjects with malaria were further divided into P. vivax and P. falciparum cases. In all the cases, the clinical, laboratory, and sociodemographic factors were assessed. Data gathered were analyzed statistically. Results: During the study period, 222 cases of malaria were assessed where 22.52% (n = 50) and 74.48% (n = 172) cases were due to P. falciparum and P. vivax, respectively. Hepatomegaly was common in P. falciparum cases and splenomegaly in P. vivax cases. Thrombocytopenia was seen in 58.1% (n = 100) and 72% (n = 36) subjects with P. vivax and P. falciparum cases. No significant difference was seen in other laboratory parameters. Conclusions: Clinical, laboratory, and sociodemographic factors associated with malaria from P. falciparum and P. vivax have no statistically significant difference.

Indexed as

Clinical featureslaboratory parametersmalariaP. falciparumP. vivaxsociodemographic data

Identifiers

PMID39926866
PMCPMC11805264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.