ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Prevalence, Severity, and Predictors of Apical Root Resorption Following Orthodontic Treatment: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of external apical root resorption in maxillary anterior teeth following en-masse versus two-step retraction: a 3D volumetric CBCT-based randomized controlled trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Orthodontic Treatment and External Apical Root Resorption: A Study on the Worldwide Prevalence - A Scoping Review.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the prevalence, severity, and predictors of apical root resorption following orthodontic treatment using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the CBCT scans of 141 orthodontic patients (76 males and 65 females). CBCT images were meticulously assessed for the presence and severity of apical root resorption using standardized grading criteria. Results: The prevalence of apical root resorption was 45.4%. Among those with root resorption, 35.5% exhibited grade 1 resorption, while 10.8% showed grade 2 resorption. Sex was not significantly associated with the severity of root resorption ( Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the prevalence, severity, and predictors of apical root resorption following orthodontic treatment using CBCT imaging. These findings highlight the importance of considering patient demographics and treatment duration in treatment planning to mitigate the risk of root resorption and enhance treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.