ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Efficacy of Virtual Reality as a Treatment Modality on Preoperative vs Postoperative Patient Anxiety: A Systematic Review.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual reality for reducing intraoperative anxiety and improving patient satisfaction under regional anesthesia among palestinian patients: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Permissive hypercapnia combined with goal-directed fluid therapy improve postoperative mental health in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- The effect of virtual reality on pain, anxiety, and physiological parameters in patients undergoing gastroscopy.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of VR as a treatment modality on preoperative vs postoperative patient anxiety. Methods: A thorough search was performed over seven databases using Boolean operators and MeSH terms. Studies that used VR interventions and measured anxiety outcomes were included in the review. Results: The included studies seem to indicate that VR interventions could help to decrease anxiety in surgical patients. Most of the studies reported significant decreases in anxiety scores or improved anxiety outcomes for their VR groups as compared to control groups or standard care groups. Specifically, preoperative and postoperative anxiety scores were found to be significantly lower in VR groups compared to control groups. Conclusion: The combined results of the studies do imply that VR interventions have a positive effect on decreasing anxiety in surgical patients. Although some studies demonstrated a consistent pattern of results, others exhibit differences in their findings, which may be attributed to differences in study design, population, or intervention protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.