Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926843›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024

Efficacy of Virtual Reality as a Treatment Modality on Preoperative vs Postoperative Patient Anxiety: A Systematic Review.

Faris S S Aldobekhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Faris S S AldobekhiDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of VR as a treatment modality on preoperative vs postoperative patient anxiety. Methods: A thorough search was performed over seven databases using Boolean operators and MeSH terms. Studies that used VR interventions and measured anxiety outcomes were included in the review. Results: The included studies seem to indicate that VR interventions could help to decrease anxiety in surgical patients. Most of the studies reported significant decreases in anxiety scores or improved anxiety outcomes for their VR groups as compared to control groups or standard care groups. Specifically, preoperative and postoperative anxiety scores were found to be significantly lower in VR groups compared to control groups. Conclusion: The combined results of the studies do imply that VR interventions have a positive effect on decreasing anxiety in surgical patients. Although some studies demonstrated a consistent pattern of results, others exhibit differences in their findings, which may be attributed to differences in study design, population, or intervention protocols.

Indexed as

Anxietypostoperative anxietypreoperative anxietysurgeryvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39926843
PMCPMC11805186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.