ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Single Tooth Implant Vs Non-Surgical Root Canal: Long-Term Survival Rates.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative outcomes of endodontically treated teeth versus dental implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- Root Canal Therapy Versus Single-Tooth Dental Implants for Compromised Teeth: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Initial root canal treatment and the replacement of a single tooth with implants are both viable treatment options, but various success rates have been reported for each treatment modality. Materials and Methods: This study compared 145 implant and 176 root canal treatment teeth in patients for four possible outcomes- success, survival, and failure. Results: Outcomes were as follows for root canal treatment and implant outcomes, respectively: success 75.56% and 80.00%; survival 18.18% and 11.72%; and failure 6.25% and 8.27%. The location of the restoration in the mouth did not affect the outcome. Conclusion: This study suggests that restored endodontically treated teeth and single tooth implant restorations have similar failure rates, although the implant group showed a longer average and median time to function and a higher incidence of postoperative complications requiring subsequent treatment intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.