ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Effect of Enamel Surface Coating on Staining Capability Due to Iron-Containing Supplements on Primary Teeth: An
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of pH and viscosity of two different iron supplements on enamel discoloration in permanent teeth: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluate enamel surface staining due to iron supplements on primary teeth - AnBioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The staining of primary teeth due to iron-containing supplements is a common concern among parents and healthcare providers. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted primary teeth were divided into two groups of 20 each. Group A served as the control and received no enamel coating, while Group B was treated with a commercially available enamel surface coating. Both groups were then exposed to iron-containing supplements for 7 days. The teeth were assessed for color changes using a spectrophotometer before and after exposure. The degree of staining was quantified using the CIELAB color space values, specifically the ΔE* value, which indicates the change in color. Results: The mean ΔE* value in Group A (control) was 12.5 ± 1.8, indicating significant staining. In contrast, Group B (coated) showed a mean ΔE* value of 4.2 ± 1.1, reflecting minimal staining. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( Conclusion: Enamel surface coatings significantly reduce the staining effect of iron-containing supplements on primary teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.