Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926816›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024

Comparative

Joyeta Ghosh, Bhagyesh J Cheta, Yogesh V Rathod, Richa Pathak, Shruti A Nayak, K Vishnu Prasad

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joyeta GhoshDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Bhagyesh J ChetaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Yogesh V RathodDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Richa PathakDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.
Shruti A NayakDepartment of Dentistry, AIIMS, Bibinagar, Telangana, India.
K Vishnu PrasadDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The study's objective is to assess the bond strengths of four different endodontic sealers to root dentin using a push-out test technique. Material and Method: Sixty single-rooted teeth were selected and decoronated. Canal instrumentation was done using rotary files and divided into four groups ( Result: According to the results, group 4 had the strongest push-out relationship, followed by groups 3, 2, and 1, respectively. It can be concluded that the bioceramic sealers have superior bond strengths. Conclusion: Bioceramic sealers demonstrated the highest bond strengths to root dentin, outperforming methacrylate, epoxy resin, and zinc oxide eugenol sealers in the push-out test.

Indexed as

Bioceramic sealerepoxy resin-based sealermethacrylate-based sealerpush-out bond strengthroot canal sealers

Identifiers

PMID39926816
PMCPMC11805274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.