ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Impact of Implant Angulation on Stress Distribution and Survival Rate of Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Prospective Clinical Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dental implantology has witnessed substantial progress, particularly with the widespread use of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) for edentulous patients. Methods: In this prospective clinical study involving 146 adult participants requiring implant-supported FDPs, a randomized allocation placed individuals into either the control group (ideal angulation) or the experimental group (deviated angulation). A comprehensive investigation unfolded through finite element analysis (FEA), examining biomechanical aspects. This was complemented by thorough clinical assessments and the collection of patient-reported outcomes. Results: The application of FEA unveiled a statistically significant increase in the maximum von Mises stress within the experimental group ( Conclusion: While finite element analysis identified biomechanical differences associated with deviated implant angulation, these distinctions did not consistently translate into clinically significant variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.