ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Mentees perception of Formal Mentorship at public sector Medical School, Pakistan.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate medical students' experiences with mentors along with strengths and limitations of the first formal mentorship program at Medical School. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted at Services Institute of Medical Sciences, a public sector medical college in Lahore. The mentoring program was planned and implemented for first time from January 2022 to November 2022 for MBBS students. Mentors were faculty members who received training prior to the program. Mentorship session of two hours every month was included in timetable. After the successful completion of one year of the program, the feedback questionnaire was filled by mentees about their perceptions about mentors and mentorship program and analyzed. Results: A total of 362 students gave feedback. The findings highlight that 327/362 (90.3%) of students had positive experiences with their mentors, particularly in areas of mentor accessibility, confidence building, learning ethical behavior, how to study smart, professionalism, psychological support and communication skills. There were five key strengths identified by student responses including personal development and support 141(40%), better communication and interaction 131(35%), time and relationships management skills 22(6%) and professional guidance 10(3%). Around 107(29%) of the students did not perceive any weaknesses in the mentorship program. Half of the respondents expressed concerns about the lack of assurance regarding confidentiality. Around (15.1%) reported hesitancy in communicating within group settings and suggested individual distraction free sessions. Conclusion: Formal mentorship program is beneficial in personal and professional development of students. A comprehensive framework that ensures confidentiality should be considered to enhance its effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.