Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926693›Full record

ReviewPakistan journal of medical sciences2025

Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression among Nurses during the early phase of COVID-19: A meta-analysis.

Khalil Ahmed Jatt, Erika Sivarajan Froelicher, Abel Jacobus Pienaar, Khairunnisa Aziz Dhamani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Khalil Ahmed JattKhalil Ahmed Jatt, PhD, Shifa College of Nursing, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Erika Sivarajan FroelicherErika Sivarajan Froelicher, PhD Professor of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, California, United States.
Abel Jacobus PienaarAbel Jacobus Pienaar, PhD Professor, Boitekanelo College, Gaborone, Botswana. Adjunct Professor, Durban University of Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Durban, South Africa.
Khairunnisa Aziz DhamaniKhairunnisa Aziz Dhamani, PhD, Shifa College of Nursing, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant mental health challenges among healthcare workers, particularly nurses, who are key frontline responders and are the largest segment of the global health workforce. Given the ongoing threat of Mpox and potential new COVID-19 variants, understanding these challenges is vital. This review estimates the prevalence of anxiety and depression among nurses during the early phase of the pandemic to inform future pandemic responses. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies published from January 1st to November 9, 2020. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. This review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to estimate the pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression. Findings: Twenty-seven studies, involving 39,386 nurses from ten countries, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of anxiety across 24 studies was 38.54% (95% CI: 33.99, 43.10) (I Interpretation: The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression in nurses caring for patients with COVID-19 during the early phase of the pandemic was higher than that in other healthcare workers. With the ongoing Mpox outbreak and the potential for future pandemics, these findings necessitate timely screening and robust mental health strategies to support nurses and enhance healthcare resilience.

Indexed as

AnxietyCOVID-19DepressionMeta-analysisNursesPandemicReviewSystematic

Identifiers

PMID39926693
PMCPMC11803779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.