ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Late Preterm Infants.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning assisted breathomic approach for early-stage thoracic cancer detection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To find out the risk factors for respiratory distress syndrome in late preterm infants. Methods: This was a retrospective study. A total of 1605 premature infants born in Maternity & Child Care Center of Qinhuangdao from January 2020 to June 2023 were selected as the research subjects. They were divided into RDS group and non RDS group based on the presence or absence of respiratory distress syndrome(RDS). The clinical pathological characteristics of the two groups of patients were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for respiratory distress syndrome in late stage premature infants. Results: The results of univariate analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in neonatal weight, placental abnormalities, gestational hypertension, and maternal age between the RDS group and the non RDS group(P>0.05). There were significant differences in gender, whether premature rupture of membranes, whether cesarean section, and diabetes during pregnancy(P<0.05). The binary logistic regression analysis showed that gender(male), cesarean section(yes) and diabetes in pregnancy(yes) were all risk factors for RDS in preterm infants (P<0.05). Premature rupture of membranes is a protective factor for RDS in premature infants (P<0.05). Gender (male), cesarean section(yes), and diabetes in pregnancy(yes) were all risk factors for poor prognosis of RDS children(P<0.05). Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) is a protective factor for poor prognosis in premature infants (P<0.05). Conclusion: Male sex, cesarean section, and diabetes in pregnancy may be the risk factors for RDS and poor prognosis of premature infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.