ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Analysis of risk factors for death during treatment of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the risk factors associated with the occurrence of death during the treatment of patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Methods: The present study is a retrospective research design, which selected 136 patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures admitted to China Resource & WISCO General Hospital from March 2020 to March 2022 as the subjects of the study. They were divided into a survival group (113 cases) and a death group (23 cases) according to whether the patients died during treatment. The general clinical data and laboratory test indexes of the two groups were compared to analyze the risk factors affecting the death of pelvic fracture patients. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve was calculated. Results: The two groups were significantly different in aspects of age, systolic blood pressure, rapid emergency medicine score, injury severity score (ISS), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and percentages of patients with bleeding volume > 2,000 mL, shock index > 2, and minimum oxygenation index < 200 (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis suggested that shock index > 2, ISS, SOFA score, and bleeding volume > 2,000 mL were independent risk factors for patient death. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve for shock index > 2, ISS, SOFA score, and bleeding volume > 2,000 mL was 0.656, 0.732, 0.907, and 0.798, respectively. Conclusions: Severe shock, increased ISS and SOFA score, and bleeding are independent risk factors for death in patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Implementation of rapid and efficient targeted management during treatment of high-risk patients with these factors is key to reducing their risk of death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.