ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
The effect of Schroth Therapy combined with spinal manipulation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gait Kinematic Adaptations Following Schroth Therapy in Individuals with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Vitamin-D status in sixty adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: An observational study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- The traditional Chinese medicine manipulation combined with Schroth exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Schroth method combined with spinal manipulation treatment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study performed between January 2023 and February 2024, in which 150 patients with AIS were treated with Schroth method with or without spinal manipulation at Wenzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital. Patients were classified into a study group and a control group with 50 patients in each group after screening. Intervention effects, maximum Cobb angle, clavicle angle before and after the treatment, trunk rotation angle, vertebral rotation angle, and lumbar range of motion (range of motion for lumbar extension and flexion) were compared between the two groups. Results: The overall efficacy of intervention in the study group was higher than that in the control group (96.00% Conclusions: In patients with AIS, combining the Schroth method and spinal manipulation treatment was more effective in reducing the maximum Cobb and clavicle angles, trunk rotation angle, and vertebral rotation angle and restoring the lumbar range of motion compared to the Schroth method alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.