ArticleCureus2025
Creating Alternative Afferent Input to Facilitate the Regeneration of Injured Primary Afferent Neurons.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The trigeminal spinal tract nucleus receives primary afferent input from the orofacial region, serving as a relay between peripheral terminals and secondary neurons. The trigeminal nerve is divided into ophthalmic, maxillary, and mandibular. While it is known that primary afferent terminals synapse with secondary neurons, the interaction between different primary terminals remains unclear. Recent studies have shown that trigeminal neurons with lost input can be activated through electrical stimulation of other afferent terminals. Therefore, we examined the possibility of inducing neural activity using synaptic organizers to promote circuit reorganization. To assess the regeneration of the injured inferior alveolar nerve (third division of the trigeminal nerve), the potential involvement of input from the infraorbital nerve (second division of the trigeminal nerve) in the regeneration of the injured inferior alveolar nerve (third division of the trigeminal nerve) was investigated. Intact and injured groups were created for the second and third divisions to facilitate comparative analysis. A synapse organizer was applied to establish input between the primary afferent terminals of these divisions. This study aimed to determine if central connections between different terminals can activate trigeminal neurons with lost input, ultimately promoting peripheral nerve regeneration. In this research, male C57BL/6J mice (seven to nine weeks old) (total n=40) underwent transection of the inferior alveolar nerve. They were divided into three groups: intact (n=10), injured (saline control) (n=10), and synapse organizer (n=10). In addition, the mice were divided into two groups: one group underwent inferior alveolar nerve transection only (II, intact; III, injured, n=5), and the other group underwent transection of both the infraorbital and inferior alveolar nerves (II, injured; III, injured, n=5), followed by local administration of a synapse organizer. Regeneration was assessed using immunostaining, sensory tests, and retrograde tracing. Regeneration was confirmed by retrograde tracing and functional recovery of sensory thresholds in the skin of the mental region. These findings align with previous observations that infraorbital nerve transection reduced regeneration activity, suggesting that infraorbital input triggered regeneration in the mandibular nerve. Thus, the results propose a novel therapeutic approach where mandibular nerve injury can be treated by stimulating the infraorbital nerve immediately after injury, enhancing peripheral nerve regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.