ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Novel immunochromatographic test for rapid detection of anti-factor H autoantibodies with an assessment of its clinical relevance.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunoglobulin Isotype Profiling of Anti-Factor H Autoantibodies in Complement-Mediated Diseases.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Article
- Complement Inhibition in the Clinic: Are We Doing Enough to Protect Patients From Infection?European journal of immunology · 2026Review
- Complement diagnostics and therapeutics for the pediatric population: early successes and opportunities for further advancement.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Liver as a key organ for systemic antimicrobial defense.Hepatology communications · 2025Review
- Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Review of Complement Dysregulation, Genetic Susceptibility and Multiorgan Involvement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Complement-mediated HUS revisited: evolving insights into pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Factor H (FH) is a crucial complement regulator that prevents complement-mediated injury to healthy cells and tissues. This regulatory function can be disrupted by Factor H autoantibodies (FHAA), which then leads to diseases such as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) and C3 Glomerulopathy (C3G). In pediatric aHUS, the FHAA incidence is ~10-15%, although in the Indian population, it rises to ~50%. The specific regions of FH targeted by FHAAs correlate with the pathogenic mechanism of the associated disease. In aHUS, FHAAs target the C-terminus, thereby impacting FH ability to recognize cell surfaces. In C3G, in contrast, FHAAs often target the N-terminus, generating an acquired functional FH deficiency. Detection and monitoring FHAAs are decisive for effectively treating patients. Current FHAA analysis normally identify free FHAAs that bind surface-bound FH using ELISA techniques. These methods require well-equipped laboratories and qualified staff, and do not measure FH-FHAA complexes, which can make it difficult to correlate titers with clinical outcomes. The visually-based immunochromatographic test (ICT) described herein allows for quick detection and quantification of IgG and IgM FH-FHAA complexes in human EDTA-plasma or serum. This ICT offers improved detection of FHAAs compared to ELISA as demonstrated by cases where the ICT identifies FH-FHAA complexes in samples that tested negative with the free FHAA ELISA. Importantly, the ICT indirectly informs on the amount of FH that is complexed with FHAAs, thus assessing the significance of the FHAA in disrupting the regulatory function of FH. Overall, this novel assay offers a simple, fast, cost-effective, and, likely, more clinically relevant alternative for diagnosing FHAAs in at-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.