ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Evaluating Donor-Recipient Sex Mismatch in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Allograft: Outcomes at 2 Years Postoperatively.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Donor-Recipient Sex-Mismatch on Graft Failure in Osteochondral Allograft Procedures: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Female patients tend to suffer a greater risk of reinjury and worse patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) than male patients, regardless of the graft type used. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study explored the role of donor-recipient sex mismatching to help explain these sex-based disparities in outcomes after ACLR with an allograft. The hypothesis was that allograft donor-recipient sex mismatch would adversely affect surgical outcomes at a 2-year follow-up, with male-to-female graft donations yielding the lowest rates of success. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent primary ACLR with an allograft between 2012 and 2022 were eligible for recruitment. The following PROMs were collected from baseline through a 2-year follow-up: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, Marx activity rating scale, visual analog scale for pain, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. Demographic and graft-specific variables were also collected. Sex- Results: Of the 112 included patients (N = 70 women), 59 (52.7%) were sex mismatched. The mean patient age was 40.7 ± 10.9 years, and the mean body mass index was 26.8 ± 4.7 kg/m Conclusion: The study findings indicated that male donors provided larger allografts than female donors, and that donor-recipient allograft sex matching did not contribute significantly to ACLR outcomes. Other factors may be more important to outcomes in female patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.