ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation and an Accelerated Rehabilitation Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complications Related to Arthroscopic Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 4162 Patients.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- Modified Postoperative Rehabilitation Including Dynamic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Brace to Reduce Recurrence of Posterior Tibial Translation After Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is often performed for grade 3 PCL injuries, the effectiveness of different surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols is a topic of debate. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare functional outcomes and residual instability in patients who underwent PCL reconstruction with versus without suture tape augmentation. It was hypothesized was that adding high-resistance suture tape to PCL reconstruction would improve functional scores and reduce postoperative laxity. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 48 patients were included in the study; all patients underwent PCL reconstruction with an autologous quadriceps tendon graft and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Overall, 23 patients were treated with a graft only, while 25 were treated with a graft and suture tape. Patients in the suture tape augmentation group also underwent an accelerated rehabilitation program with earlier range of motion and weightbearing. Patient characteristics, Lysholm scores, posterior tibial laxity on stress radiographs at 90° of knee flexion, and postoperative complications were compared between treatment groups. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between groups in terms of patient characteristics. Similar results were seen in both groups in terms of postoperative complications. Furthermore, on average, the Lysholm score increased from 1- to 2-year follow-up by 6.99 points (standard error = 0.97 points; Conclusion: PCL reconstruction with suture tape augmentation and an accelerated rehabilitation protocol did not result in significantly improved functional scores or postoperative laxity compared with isolated PCL reconstruction. The results showed no disadvantage of a more aggressive rehabilitation protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.