Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926586›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation and an Accelerated Rehabilitation Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Arthur Cardoso Paroneto, Pedro Soneghet Gomes, Paulo Vitor Carrijo, Moises Cohen, Leonardo Addeo Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arthur Cardoso ParonetoSports Traumatology Center, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5151-390X
Pedro Soneghet GomesSports Traumatology Center, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Vitor CarrijoSports Traumatology Center, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Moises CohenSports Traumatology Center, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo Addeo RamosSports Traumatology Center, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0220-013X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is often performed for grade 3 PCL injuries, the effectiveness of different surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols is a topic of debate. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare functional outcomes and residual instability in patients who underwent PCL reconstruction with versus without suture tape augmentation. It was hypothesized was that adding high-resistance suture tape to PCL reconstruction would improve functional scores and reduce postoperative laxity. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 48 patients were included in the study; all patients underwent PCL reconstruction with an autologous quadriceps tendon graft and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Overall, 23 patients were treated with a graft only, while 25 were treated with a graft and suture tape. Patients in the suture tape augmentation group also underwent an accelerated rehabilitation program with earlier range of motion and weightbearing. Patient characteristics, Lysholm scores, posterior tibial laxity on stress radiographs at 90° of knee flexion, and postoperative complications were compared between treatment groups. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between groups in terms of patient characteristics. Similar results were seen in both groups in terms of postoperative complications. Furthermore, on average, the Lysholm score increased from 1- to 2-year follow-up by 6.99 points (standard error = 0.97 points; Conclusion: PCL reconstruction with suture tape augmentation and an accelerated rehabilitation protocol did not result in significantly improved functional scores or postoperative laxity compared with isolated PCL reconstruction. The results showed no disadvantage of a more aggressive rehabilitation protocol.

Indexed as

functional outcomesPCL reconstructionposterior cruciate ligamentresidual instabilitysuture tape augmentation

Identifiers

PMID39926586
PMCPMC11806459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.