ArticleACS omega2025
Macrophage Responses to Multicore Encapsulated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell Membrane-Engineered FePDA Nanoparticles Integrate Ferroptosis and Antitumor Immunity.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Sterilized Bioactive-Glass-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles: Physicochemical Integrity and Biological Compatibility After Gamma Irradiation.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macrophages are the primary cells responsible for nanoparticle processing and mediating host immunological biological outcomes. Their cellular response to nanoparticles is a vital constituent in the safety assessment of new designs for clinical application. An approach for the treatment of solid tumors was developed, based on magnetic hyperthermia, consisting of iron oxide multicore encapsulated nanoparticles named Sarah nanoparticles (SaNPs), and alternating magnetic field irradiation. SaNPs are intravenously injected, accumulate in the liver, spleen and in tumor tissue, where they are passively targeted to malignant cells via the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect and undergo selective heating. SaNP-induced responses after cellular uptake were investigated in murine RAW264.7 macrophages using a wide imaging approach. When activated, macrophages form different phenotypic populations with unique immune functions, however the mechanism/s by which these activated macrophages respond to nanoparticles is unclear. Unraveling these responses is important for the understanding of nanoparticle uptake, potential degradation, and clearance to address both toxicity and regulatory concerns, which was the aim of this study. The results demonstrated that SaNPs undergo internalization, localize within the lysosomal compartment while keeping their integrity, without intracellular toxic degradation, and are cleared with time. The production of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activation, and cytokine secretion in macrophage conditioned medium (CM) were also evaluated. SaNPs effects were both time- and dose- dependent. High SaNP concentrations resulted in reduced RAW264.7 cell viability which correlated with SOD activation and was associated with ROS generation. Lower SaNP concentrations stimulated the time-dependent production of TNF-α. The expression of additional cytokines was also induced, potentially affecting cancer cell growth by CM from SaNP-activated macrophages supporting a potential antitumor effect. These results will help understand the fate of nanoparticles in vivo.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.