ReviewSurgical neurology international2025
Clinical implications of sagittal stratum damage: Laterality, neuroanatomical developmental considerations, and functional outcomes.
Review in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impaired white matter functional networks topology changed with white matter hyperintensities burden and relationship to cognition.Brain imaging and behavior · 2026Article
- [White matter microstructural disturbance and its relationship with cognitive function in schizophrenia with comorbidity of metabolic syndrome].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
- Causal relationships between neuroimaging phenotypes and the risk of early and late-onset alzheimer's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The sagittal stratum (SS) is an important white matter (WM) structure that provides the anatomic substrate for cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical axial interconnections necessary to overcome sensory, cognitive and motor processes. SS damage due to diseases or surgical lesions often results in significant functional losses, mainly involving serious language, visual processing, and cognitive deficits. These risks are maximized in older adults because of age-related WM degeneration. Methods: In this comprehensive review, the research aims to synthesize research conducted on anatomy-functional roles that concern the SS, damage, and surgical outcomes. This would then separate studies that employed high neuroimaging advanced techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging, combined with intraoperative mapping performed during awake surgery. Key attention areas will, therefore, be trajectories pointing toward lateralization of the SS tracts, age-related vulnerabilities, and the effectiveness of surgical strategies in preserving SS integrity. Results: The review indicates that the pattern of SS damage is associated with lateralized deficits stemming from left-sided lesions, while language and vision are affected by right-sided. Older adults, already bearing significant WM degeneration, therefore, stand at a significantly greater risk of overall cognitive decline from compounding losses due to SS damage. However, advanced neuroimaging tools and refined surgical techniques have made the preservation of SS pathways much more effective, reducing long-term deficits. Conclusion: Intraoperative preservation of SS integrity is crucial for the reduction of functional deficits and enhancement of the outcomes. Customized surgical techniques that consider tract lateralization and age-related changes are required. Further research in this area is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.