ArticleAnnals of thoracic medicine
Adherence and influencing factors of high-flow nasal cannula humidified oxygen therapy in elderly patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of thoracic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of the study was to systematically evaluate and perform a meta-analysis on the adherence to high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) humidified oxygen therapy and its influencing factors in elderly patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
methodsRelevant literature on HFNC and COPD was retrieved from PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, and cohort studies were included. Screening and quality assessment were conducted using Endnote X9 software. Quality scores were assigned using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the AHRQ assessment tool. Basic information, sample size, and adherence-related factors were extracted, and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed.
resultsA total of 321 articles were initially identified, with 8 English articles involving 325 patients included after screening. Quality assessment yielded five high-quality articles (score > 8), two medium-quality articles (score = 7), and one low-quality article (score = 6). Meta-analysis results showed a COPD patient HFNC adherence rate of 32.7%. Negative factors included the number of acute exacerbations (odds ratio [OR] =2.17), adverse reactions (OR = 4.13), regular follow-up (OR = 9.45), educational level (OR = 5.38), and concurrent medications (OR = 4.71). Positive factors included age < 70 years (OR = 0.45), duration of use (OR = 0.30), inhalation technique (OR = 0.31), treatment satisfaction (OR = 0.35), and adverse reactions (OR = 0.15). Funnel plot and Egger's test results indicated minimal publication bias.
conclusionAdherence to HFNC in elderly COPD patients is relatively low, influenced by negative factors such as the number of acute exacerbations, adverse reactions, regular follow-up, educational level, and concurrent medications. Positive factors include age < 70 years, duration of use, inhalation technique, treatment satisfaction, and adverse reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.