Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926304›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

A Leopard Cub (

Dushyantha Silva, Milinda Wattegedera, Mevan Piyasena, Raveendra Siriwardene, Sasindu Hewage, Meegasthanne Gamaralalage Chandana Sooriyabandara, Marasinghe Sumanasirige Lesly Ranjan Pushpakumara Marasinghe, Rajapakse M R Nilanthi, Prasantha Wimaladasa, Gotabhaya Ranasinghe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dushyantha SilvaResearch and Data Gathering Team Yala Leopard Center Hambantota Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3541-6722
Milinda WattegederaResearch and Data Gathering Team Yala Leopard Center Hambantota Sri Lanka.
Mevan PiyasenaResearch and Data Gathering Team Yala Leopard Center Hambantota Sri Lanka.
Raveendra SiriwardeneResearch and Data Gathering Team Yala Leopard Center Hambantota Sri Lanka.
Sasindu HewageResearch and Data Gathering Team Yala Leopard Center Hambantota Sri Lanka.
Meegasthanne Gamaralalage Chandana SooriyabandaraDepartment of Wildlife Conservation of Sri Lanka Funding Battaramulla Sri Lanka.
Marasinghe Sumanasirige Lesly Ranjan Pushpakumara MarasingheDepartment of Wildlife Conservation of Sri Lanka Funding Battaramulla Sri Lanka.
Rajapakse M R NilanthiDepartment of Wildlife Conservation of Sri Lanka Funding Battaramulla Sri Lanka.
Prasantha WimaladasaDepartment of Wildlife Conservation of Sri Lanka Funding Battaramulla Sri Lanka.
Gotabhaya RanasingheInstitute of Cardiology National Hospital of Sri Lanka Colombo Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9339-5368
Kaveesha PereraInstitute of Cardiology National Hospital of Sri Lanka Colombo Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study examines alloparental care and adoption in the Sri Lankan leopard population at Yala National Park, Sri Lanka. Using the multi-point leopard identification method, it documents a remarkable instance: a leopard cub initially adopted by its maternal aunt and later by an unrelated female with no prior connection to the cub. The cub had a sibling litter mate, who was not seen in the park after the initial adoption ended by the maternal aunt. We consider this behavior noteworthy in especially solitary animal species such as leopards. Our study was conducted for a period of 2 years and 5 months (from February 2021 to July 2023). Our observations highlight the dynamics of these adoptions and the behaviors exhibited. Altruistic acts, such as feeding, brushing, and shielding the cubs, were observed. These inspections challenge the conventional knowledge regarding leopard behaviors. Notably, the adoption of the cub by unrelated females, despite the absence of genetic ties, exemplifies a form of mutually beneficial reciprocal altruism, offering advantages to both parties. The following study explains leopard adoptions using evolutionary theories like kin altruism and reciprocal altruism. It suggests factors such as genetic relatedness, mutual dependency, and possible misidentification influenced the act of adoption. These rare altruistic acts benefit the leopard population. Our study opposes traditional concepts of solitary Sri Lankan leopards. Altruistic behaviors, influenced by genetic relatedness and reciprocal benefits, emphasize social dynamics in predator populations. These findings enhance the understanding of evolutionary mechanisms and cooperative behaviors in maintaining population fitness in the Sri Lankan leopard population.

Identifiers

PMID39926304
PMCPMC11806377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.