ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Reproducibility and concordance of functional autonomy tests in older adult women: a comparative study of face-to-face and virtual assessments.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biosimilar Uptake in Spain from 2016 to 2023: Analysis Based on Official Data Collection.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Article
- Association between muscle quality index and time to stand up from the prone position in community-dwelling older adults.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The literature does not explore functional assessments carried out remotely and in older women in virtual environments. Objective: This study analyzed the reproducibility and agreement in applying functional autonomy tests face to face (FF) and virtually (V). Methods: A single evaluator carried out two evaluations. The following tests were performed: walking 10 m, rising from the sitting position (RSP), rising from the ventral decubitus position (RVDP), and sitting and rising from a chair and walking around the house (SRCW). Results: No significant changes were identified between V and FF ( Conclusion: The tests used in the present study showed good reproducibility and agreement in older people when carried out face to face and virtually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.