ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Cresp
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Anemia, a frequently encountered issue among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, is regrettably underappreciated despite its prevalence and profound impact on their well-being. Chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) diminishes the quality of life, causing fatigue, breathlessness, and a decline in the performance status. However, correcting anemia can lead to notable improvements in these parameters. Notably, darbepoetin alpha (DA) has shown efficacy in addressing anemia in this context. This real-world study aims to evaluate the efficacy of DA in the treatment of CIA among Indian cancer patients. Methods: This single-center retrospective study assessed the effectiveness of DA in treating CIA among advanced/metastatic solid tumor patients on palliative myelosuppressive therapy. The study measured the change in hemoglobin levels after DA administration as the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes including impact on blood transfusion dependence, changes in anemia-related symptoms, and occurrence of adverse events. Results: A total of 523 patients, with a median age of 55, were included in the study. Patients were categorized based on cancer site, type of chemotherapy, response to therapy, and DA doses. A significant mean increase of 2.28 gm/dl in hemoglobin (Hb) levels from baseline to post-DA administration was observed (8.56±0.45 to 10.84±0.92; 26.6%; Discussion: DA demonstrates impressive efficacy and safety in managing CIA, leading to substantial improvements in mean hemoglobin levels in palliative setting. This has the potential to reduce the need for blood transfusions and enhance the quality of life for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.