Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926276›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Benefit from regular versus leakage-related exchange of voice prostheses in patients post-laryngectomy considering complication rates and patient satisfaction feedback-a randomized case-controlled trial.

Michał Żurek, Małgorzata Czesak, Daniel Majszyk, Anna Rzepakowska

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04268459 (Estimation of Benefit From Regular Versus Leakage-related Exchange of Voice Prosthesis in Patients Post Laryngectomy Considering Complications Rate, Fistula Colonization by Candida Species and Patients Satisfaction Feedback.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04268459 naunknown statusnot on this map

Estimation of Benefit From Regular Versus Leakage-related Exchange of Voice Prosthesis in Patients Post Laryngectomy Considering Complications Rate, Fistula Colonization by Candida Species and Patients Satisfaction Feedback.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of WarsawRan2020 to 2022Enrolled70ConditionsLaryngectomy, Voice, Prosthesis FailureArmsProvox prosthesis exchange
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michał ŻurekOtorhinolaryngology Department, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Małgorzata CzesakOtorhinolaryngology Department, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Daniel MajszykOtorhinolaryngology Department, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna RzepakowskaOtorhinolaryngology Department, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The complications related to voice prosthesis usage substantially affect the physical and social functioning of patients after total laryngectomy, which influences their quality of life. Leakage dysfunction is the most common, causing uncertainty and requiring unscheduled hospital visits. Our study was designed to estimate the benefit of regular versus leakage-related replacement of the voice prosthesis. Study Design. Randomized case-controlled trials. Setting. Tertiary hospital. Methods: The study included patients who underwent total laryngectomy with primary voice prosthesis insertion between 2020 and 2021 and were randomly assigned to one of two arms: regular exchange (REA) every 3 months or leakage-dependent exchange (LEA). The control treatment was continued for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the comparison of complication rates in both arms, including periprosthetic leakage, granulation or atrophy of mucosa around the fistula, and dislocation of the prosthesis. The secondary outcome measures were the mean number of exchanges per year and patient satisfaction. Results: Thirty-six patients continued the study according to the protocol, with 16 in REA and 20 in LEA. A total of 153 voice prostheses were replaced during the study period, including 98 in REA and 55 in LEA. Comparative analysis of REA and LEA revealed a significantly longer time between replacements in the LEA group (p = 0.023) and a significantly lower rate of complications in the REA group (p = 0.029). Periprosthetic leakage was the most common complication associated with the use of voice prostheses, occurring in 3.06% of patients in REA and 9.09% in LEA, but this difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.137). The analysis of factors predisposing patients to leakage failure revealed that treatment schemes, concomitant diseases, dental conditions, and diet or alcohol consumption significantly affect the longevity of voice prostheses. The relative and absolute risks (RRR and ARR) of complications in the REA group were reduced by 69.39% and 13.88%, respectively. The number of replacements (NNTs) that should be performed in the REA scheme to prevent one complication over the LEA scheme is 721. Conclusion: The replacement of regular voice prostheses improved the overall complication rate over the scheme based on leakage demand; however, it did not yield superior benefits in terms of patient satisfaction or economic aspects. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04268459, identifier NCT04268459.

Indexed as

device lifetimeprosthetic leakagereplacement ratetotal laryngectomyvoice prosthesisvoice rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39926276
PMCPMC11802546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.