Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926188›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2025

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Guidelines and Consensus on the Definition, Current Evidence, Clinical Use and Future Applications for Physiologic Closed-Loop Controlled Neuromodulation in Chronic Pain: A NEURON Group Project.

Jason E Pope, Timothy Ray Deer, Dawood Sayed, Ajay B Antony, Harjot Singh Bhandal, Aaron K Calodney, Krishnan Chakravarthy, Shrif Costandi, Jack Diep, Shravani Durbhakula and 25 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Jason E PopeEvolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA.
Timothy Ray DeerPain Services, The Spine & Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8907-7730
Dawood SayedDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-2140
Ajay B AntonyThe Orthopaedic Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Harjot Singh BhandalEvolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3417-4354
Aaron K CalodneyClinical Research, Precision Spine Care, Tyler, TX, USA.
Krishnan ChakravarthyAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Solaris Research Institute, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Shrif CostandiPain Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jack DiepNevada Pain Management, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Shravani DurbhakulaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Michael A FishmanMichael Fishman MD PLLC, Lebanon, PA, USA.
Christopher GilliganRobert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Johnathan Heck GoreeDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0548-852X
Maged GuirguisInterventional Pain Management Department, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Jonathan Michael HagedornDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1039-8166
Corey William HunterAinsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York City, NY, USA.
Jan Willem KallewaardAmsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7681-1796
Leonardo KapuralCarolinas Pain Institute, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Christopher M LamDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2848-6255
Sean LiNational Spine and Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0492-1179
Brian MayrsohnInterventional Pain Management, Maywell Health, Plainview, NY, USA.
Harold NijhuisAnesthesiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0188-0893
Serge NikolicPain Medicine and Neuromodulation, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Erika A PetersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Lawrence Raymond PoreeAnesthesia- Division of Pain Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9937-2864
Shawn K PuriIntegrated Pain Associates, Killeen, TX, USA.
David E ReeceAbsolute Pain Management, Rockville, MD, USA.
Steven Mark RosenDelaware Valley Pain and Spine Institute, Trevose, PA, USA.
Marc A RussoSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7364-9917
Jay M ShahSamwell Institute of Pain Management, Colonia, Livingston, and Englewood, NJ, USA.
Peter Sean StaatsNational Spine and Pain Centers, Atlantic Beach, FL, USA.
Paul VerrillsMetropain, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Chau M VuEvolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-9488-1550
Robert M LevyNeuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, International Neuromodulation Society, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Nagy MekhailEvidence-Based Pain Management Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Neuromodulation has been a staple of treatment for moderate-to-severe chronic refractory pain since the introduction of the first spinal cord stimulator by Norman Shealy in 1967. Appreciating the dynamic nature of electrical modulation of the nervous system from the epidural space, the goal has been consistent, reliable, and therapeutic neural activation of the spinal cord. This has proven to be extremely difficult. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a guidance on physiologic closed loop controlled (PCLC) devices, highlighting the potential for these therapies to deliver accurate, consistent, real-time therapy, enhancing medical care and reducing variability. Because of the growing neuromodulation market focus on PCLC strategies, the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) sought to develop guidance on safety and efficacy, along with a taxonomy surrounding PCLC systems (PCLCSs) and to develop an evidence-based best practice review. Methods: A librarian-assisted literature search was performed to identify manuscripts relevant to the topic of PCLC stimulation for management of chronic pain. Initial literature search was performed utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane database, BioMed Central, and Web of Science. Included manuscripts encompassed meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective or retrospective studies with follow-up to 12 months, limited to the English language. MESH terms utilized included "closed-loop", "physiologic closed loop controlled", "spinal cord stimulation", "closed loop feedback", "feedback controlled", "neuromodulation", "pain", "persistent pain", "neuropathic pain", and "chronic pain". The modified USPSTF evidence and recommendation grading strategy previously utilized was again employed. Results: Four studies were identified for review, 2 prospective, one retrospective, and one randomized controlled study with at least 12-month follow-up. Conclusion: PCLC neuromodulation is an innovation that requires a responsible introduction. As commercial access grows, there is a responsibility that requires consistency with definition, evidence generation, focused on safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

chronic painclinical evidence reviewclosed loop stimulationneuromodulationneuropathic painphysiologic closed loop stimulationspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39926188
PMCPMC11804234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.