Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926183›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025

Diagnostics for categorical response models based on quantile residuals and distance measures.

Patrícia Peres Araripe, Idemauro Antonio Rodrigues de Lara, Gabriel Rodrigues Palma, Niamh Cahill, Rafael de Andrade Moral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrícia Peres AraripeEscola Superior de Agricultura 'Luiz de Queiroz', Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Idemauro Antonio Rodrigues de LaraDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-9855
Gabriel Rodrigues PalmaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0718-2954
Niamh CahillDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3086-550X
Rafael de Andrade MoralDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0875-3563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polytomous categorical data are frequent in studies, that can be obtained with an individual or grouped structure. In both structures, the generalized logit model is commonly used to relate the covariates on the response variable. After fitting a model, one of the challenges is the definition of an appropriate residual and choosing diagnostic techniques. Since the polytomous variable is multivariate, raw, Pearson, or deviance residuals are vectors and their asymptotic distribution is generally unknown, which leads to difficulties in graphical visualization and interpretation. Therefore, the definition of appropriate residuals and the choice of the correct analysis in diagnostic tools is important, especially for nominal data, where a restriction of methods is observed. This paper proposes the use of randomized quantile residuals associated with individual and grouped nominal data, as well as Euclidean and Mahalanobis distance measures, as an alternative to reduce the dimension of the residuals. We developed simulation studies with both data structures associated. The half-normal plots with simulation envelopes were used to assess model performance. These studies demonstrated a good performance of the quantile residuals, and the distance measurements allowed a better interpretation of the graphical techniques. We illustrate the proposed procedures with two applications to real data.

Indexed as

62J1262J20Generalized logit modelhalf-normal plotmaximum likelihoodmodel selectionnormality

Identifiers

PMID39926183
PMCPMC11800345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.