ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Osteoporosis Awareness, Self-Efficacy and Health Beliefs Among Staff in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge of osteoporosis prevention among health science students in North Africa: a descriptive correlational cross-sectional study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Predictors of osteoporosis self-efficacy among young and middle-aged female nurses based on self-efficacy theory and the health belief model: evidence from a tertiary hospital in Eastern China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We investigated the key factors that influence the awareness, health beliefs, and self-efficacy of osteoporosis among the staff of an obstetrics and gynecology hospital to identify the key target population for carrying out education and promotion in medical institutions, hoping to improve women's awareness and prevention and treatment consciousness of osteoporosis from the source. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 15 to October 24 in 2023, and 200 staff members were randomly sampled from an obstetrics and gynecology hospital in Hangzhou city for a questionnaire survey. We used a quantile regression model to analyze the key factors influencing the scores of each item. Results: The study results showed that undergraduate degree or above, working as a doctor, work experience of <5 years or 10-20 years and high professional technical title are related to a higher level of osteoporosis knowledge. Male gender was associated with higher exercise efficacy and calcium barriers scores. Older age and long years of working experience were associated with higher susceptibility score. Lower education level was associated with higher calcium barriers score. Doctor occupation was associated with lower seriousness score, higher exercise benefits score, higher calcium benefits scores and higher health motivation score. Professional and technical title was also related to exercise and calcium benefits score. Conclusion: When carrying out education and promotion work on osteoporosis prevention and treatment targeting the group of healthcare workers, different content and emphases should be considered, and different groups should be selected for more targeted publicity and popularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.