ArticleJournal of medical physics
A Cost-effective Breath-hold Coaching Camera System for Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiotherapy.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Organ motion can significantly affect the accurate delivery of radiation doses to the tumor, particularly for sites such as the breast, lung, abdomen, and pelvis. Managing this motion during treatment is crucial. One strategy employed to manage motion induced from respiration is breath-hold (BH), which enhances the geometric precision of dose delivery. Our institute is transitioning to using the ExacTrac Dynamic system to facilitate patient BH using surface-guided cameras. Only 20% of our linacs are equipped with surface guidance capabilities, and due to a high patient stereotactic throughput, the ability to perform in-bunker coaching for BH patients within the bunker is limited. To address this challenge, a time-of-flight camera (ToF) was developed to coach radiotherapy patients undergoing BH procedures, allowing them to gain confidence in the process outside of the bunker and before treatment. Methods: The camera underwent testing for absolute and relative accuracy, responsiveness under various environmental conditions, and comparison with the Elekta Active Breathing Coordinator (ABC) to establish correlation and testing on volunteers independently to assess usability. Results: The results showed that the absolute distance measured by the camera was nonlinear due to square light modulation, which was retrospectively corrected. Relative accuracy was tested with a QUASAR motion phantom, with results agreeing to within ± 2 mm. The camera response was found to be unaffected by changes in lighting or temperature, though it overresponded under extreme temperatures. The comparison with the Elekta ABC system yielded comparable results between lung volume and changes in surface distance during BH. All volunteers successfully followed instructions and maintained BH within ± 1 mm tolerance. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a cost-effective ToF camera to coach patients before imaging/treatment, saving valuable LINAC linac and imaging system time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.