Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926144›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical physics

A Simulation Study for Optimal Pinhole Collimator Design in Gamma Camera Systems.

M A Ghoneim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Collimator Material on Spatial Resolution and Sensitivity in Semiconductor-Based Imaging Systems: A Monte Carlo Evaluation.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M A GhoneimDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, New Valley University, El-Kharja, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The usage of a semiconductor detector with a pinhole collimator can provide high spatial resolution due to its high intrinsic resolution. However, the collimator system has low sensitivity due to the hole's small diameter. Therefore, the optimization between the spatial resolution and sensitivity is critical for determining the image quality in the gamma camera system. Aims and Objectives: A pinhole collimator was designed and simulated to achieve the desired level of resolution and sensitivity in a gamma camera by utilizing a CdTe semiconductor detector. Materials and Methods: To conduct this objective, a simulation toolkit based on the Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission (GATE) was employed. The imaging capabilities of the proposed system were assessed by varying the magnification factor and pinhole diameter to estimate spatial resolution and sensitivity. Moreover, a hot rod phantom was designed to evaluate the system's overall imaging functionality. Results: Results revealed that an increase in the pinhole diameter was correlated with an increase in sensitivity, while the spatial resolution was decreasing. There were distinct variations in sensitivity and spatial resolution depending on changes in the magnification factor as well. Finally, by analyzing trade-off curves, 1.38±0.081 mm was approximately the optimal pinhole diameter for our proposed system. Conclusion: The optimum position for a pinhole collimator with a CdTe semiconductor detector was demonstrated.

Indexed as

Gamma cameramagnification factorpinhole collimatorsensitivityspatial resolution

Identifiers

PMID39926144
PMCPMC11801103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.