ArticleJournal of medical physics
Ensemble Learning for Three-dimensional Medical Image Segmentation of Organ at Risk in Brachytherapy Using Double U-Net, Bi-directional ConvLSTM U-Net, and Transformer Network.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic review of artificial intelligence in brachytherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026Review
- Comparative dosimetric analysis of base dose and gradient-based optimization in overlapping regions of extended target volumes using an anthropomorphic phantom.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This article presents a novel approach to automate the segmentation of organ at risk (OAR) for high-dose-rate brachytherapy patients using three deep learning models combined with ensemble learning techniques. It aims to improve the accuracy and efficiency of segmentation. Materials and Methods: The dataset comprised computed tomography (CT) scans of 60 patients obtained from our own institutional image bank and 10 patients from the other institute, all in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format. Experienced radiation oncologists manually segmented four OARs for each scan. Each scan was preprocessed and three models, Double U-Net (DUN), Bi-directional ConvLSTM U-Net (BCUN), and Transformer Networks (TN), were trained on reduced CT scans (240 × 240 × 128) due to memory limitations. Ensemble learning techniques were employed to enhance accuracy and segmentation metrics. Testing and validation were conducted on 12 patients from our institute (OID) and 10 patients from another institute (DID). Results: For DID test dataset, using the ensemble learning technique combining Transformer Network (TN) and BCUN, i.e., TN + BCUN, the average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) ranged from 0.992 to 0.998, and for DUN and BCUN (DUN + BCUN) combination, the average DSC ranged from 0.990 to 0.993, which reflecting high segmentation accuracy. The 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) ranged from 0.9 to 1.2 mm for TN + BCUN and 1.1 to 1.4 mm for DUN + BCUN, demonstrating precise segmentation boundaries. Conclusion: The proposed method leverages the strengths of each network architecture. The DUN setup excels in sequential processing, the BCUN captures spatiotemporal dependencies, and transformer networks provide a robust understanding of global context. This combination enables efficient and accurate segmentation, surpassing human expert performance in both time and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.