ArticleJournal of medical physics
Quantitative Assessment of Photoneutron-induced Secondary Radiation Dose in Prostate Treatment Using an 18 MV Medical Linear Accelerator: A Monte Carlo Study.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to quantify the secondary radiation dose caused by photoneutrons during prostate cancer treatment using an 18 MV medical linear accelerator (LINAC) through Monte Carlo simulations and experimental validation. Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed using G4Linac_MT to model the 18 MV photon beam of an Elekta LINAC. The simulation results were validated against experimental measurements. Neutron characteristics, including penetration, cross-section interactions, Linear Energy Transfer (LET), and dose contributions, were analyzed using an adult male ICRP phantom. Prostate treatment scenarios involved 3D-CRT plans with 4-fields, 5-fields, and 7-fields. Specific absorbed fractions (SAFs) in various organs were also evaluated. Results: Simulation and experimental measurements showed strong agreement, with a dose error of approximately 0.74%, and 97% of dose points passed a 2%/2 mm gamma index. Intermediate neutrons constituted 87.05%, while 12.95% were fast neutrons. Neutron dose contributions were 0.63%, 0.33%, and 0.77% for the 3D-CRT 4-field, 5-field, and 7-field plans, respectively. SAF values decreased as neutron energy increased, highlighting reduced neutron interaction efficiency at higher energies. Conclusions: Monte Carlo simulation is a reliable approach for evaluating neutron dose contributions in high-energy X-ray LINACs. Optimization of treatment plans is essential to minimize neutron-induced dose contributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.