ArticleJournal of medical physics
Analysis of Planning Risk Volume for Heart during Radiotherapy Delivery with Breath-Hold Technique for Carcinoma of Left Breast.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to analyze and estimate planning risk volume (PRV) margin for heart in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH)-based left breast radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Fifty left-sided cancer breast cases treated with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy were included in this retrospective study. Treatment plans were created using the Eclipse treatment planning system from Varian Medical System. The treatment was delivered on TrueBeam linear accelerator (Varian). Onboard cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were generated and image registration between the planning computed tomography images and the CBCT images was performed before treatment delivery. The registration provided the shifts (errors) values in 6° of freedom, namely three translational and three rotational. From the shift values, the systematic and random errors were estimated which were used to estimate PRV margin for the heart after incorporating the rotational errors with the translational errors. Results: The systematic error values after incorporating rotational errors with translational errors were 0.13 cm (lateral) and 0.11 cm (cranio caudal [CC] and anterioposterior each), and the random error values were 0.16 cm (lateral) and 0.13 cm (CC and anterioposterior each). Based on these values, the PRV margins for the heart in all three directions were 0.24 cm (lateral), 0.20 cm (CC), and 0.19 cm (anterioposterior). Conclusion: As per our institutional practice, the 2 mm value for PRV margin for the heart in all the three directions would suffice for appropriate sparing of the heart during DIBH-based radiation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.