ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2025
Effect of pregnancy on bioprosthetic structural valve degeneration.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pregnancy with prosthetic heart valves: navigating risks, anticoagulation, and valve function in a growing population.Future cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite increasing frequency of pregnancies among patients with cardiac conditions, including the presence of prosthetic heart valves, data on the effects of physiological changes during pregnancy on the function of bioprosthetic valves remains scarce and shows conflicting results. Objectives: This study was aimed to determine the effect of pregnancy on the rate of bioprosthetic structural valve degeneration. Methods: We designed a retrospective matched cohort study of patients seen between June 2018 and February 2023. All pregnant patients with bioprosthetic valves were matched to non-pregnant controls with prior valve replacement based on bioprosthetic valve location, time since valve implantation, age of the patient at valve implantation and time between baseline and follow up echocardiograms. Echocardiograms of pregnant patients were evaluated for bioprosthetic structural valve degeneration grade based on a dedicated scale before and after pregnancy. Non-pregnant controls had echocardiogram scoring of structural valve degeneration over a similar time period. Results: Thirty four pregnant patients with bioprosthetic valves in the pulmonary, aortic and mitral positions were matched with 71 non-pregnant controls with identical bioprosthetic valves locations. Over a median follow up period of 13.5 months that included the gestational period, 18 (53 %) pregnant patients had an increase in structural valve degeneration score as compared to 17 (26 %) of the non-pregnant patients in median follow up of 13.7 months (OR 3.87, p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, pregnancy was the only variable associated with increased structural valve degeneration score. Conclusions: Our results suggest that pregnancy is associated with increased bioprosthetic structural valve degeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.