ArticleJMA journal2025
Patient Sex and Physician Gender as Modifiers of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Control in High-risk Patients of Atherosclerotic Disease: A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Inadequate management of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is more common in female patients than in male patients in the context of preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Moreover, the effect of physician gender on patient outcomes has been acknowledged. However, to date, no study in Japan has investigated this issue or explored the potential interactions between patient sex and physician gender. This study aimed to assess disparities in achieving LDL cholesterol targets between male and female patients and examine the impact of the patient-physician gender dyad. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using electronic medical records from an urban Japanese clinic. Patients aged 40-79 years with coronary artery disease, noncardiogenic stroke, or diabetes mellitus were included in the study. The modified Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used, and patients were stratified by sex to evaluate the interaction between patient sex and physician gender. Results: Among the 714 patients (44.1% women), female patients were less likely to achieve LDL cholesterol targets than male patients (70.7% male vs. 63.9% female). Adjusted analyses revealed that this trend persisted for female patients (adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.96). A notable interaction between patient sex and physician gender was observed; male patients managed by female physicians had lower LDL cholesterol target achievement than male patients managed by male physicians (adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.62-0.88]). Conclusions: Female patients were less likely to achieve LDL cholesterol targets, and patient-physician gender discordance was associated with poorer lipid management. These findings highlight the need for quality improvement interventions to address the disparity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.