ReviewJMA journal2025
Artificial Intelligence in Clinics: Enhancing Cardiology Practice.
Review in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Video-Based Automatic Quantification of Leg Edema: a Pilot Study in Patients With Hemodialysis With and Without Heart Failure - Proof-of-Concept Study.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- AI-Based Predictive Models for Cardiogenic Shock in STEMI: Real-World Data for Early Risk Assessment and Prognostic Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, every aspect of the society has rapidly transformed because of the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. AI excels not only in image and voice recognition and analysis but also in achieving near-natural conversations through the development of large language models. These technological innovations are steadily being integrated into healthcare settings and can significantly change the way physicians work in clinics in the near future. Patient interviews will predominantly be performed by AI. Physicians will discuss the findings of traditional tests like electrocardiograms and chest X-rays with AI, providing beyond-human interpretation. Additionally, AI is changing areas that have seen little development for a long time, such as auscultation and phonocardiography, and the recognition and quantification of previously challenging observations like the gait analysis. Although barriers to real-world implementation exist, in the near future, a majority of physicians will collaborate with AIs supporting various aspects of clinical practice, consequently enabling more accurate and appropriate diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases, including ischemic and valvular heart diseases, arrhythmias, and heart failure. This review focuses on AI application in the field of cardiology, specifically on how it can improve the workflow in clinical settings. We examine various examples of AI integration in cardiology to demonstrate how these technologies can lead to more accurate and efficient patient care. Understanding the advancements in AI can lead to more appropriate and streamlined medical practices, which will ultimately benefit both healthcare providers and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.