Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926097›Full record

ArticleJMA journal2025

Current Status and Management Strategies of Obstetric Hemorrhage Using Contrast-enhanced Dynamic Computed Tomography in a Representative Tertiary Perinatal Medical Center in Japan.

Naohiro Suzuki, Yoshitsugu Chigusa, Haruta Mogami, Maya Komatsu, Masahito Takakura, Ken Shinozuka, Shigeru Ohtsuru, Masaki Mandai, Eiji Kondoh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naohiro SuzukiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshitsugu ChigusaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Haruta MogamiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Maya KomatsuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Masahito TakakuraDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ken ShinozukaDepartment of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Shigeru OhtsuruDepartment of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Masaki MandaiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Eiji KondohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality. Our hospital protocol states that patients with obstetric hemorrhage undergo initial imaging with contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography (CE-dCT) to ascertain the presence and location of active bleeding, followed by tailored therapeutic interventions. Herein, we aimed to elucidate the prevailing status and clinical outcomes of obstetric hemorrhage cases at our institution, which are characterized by a distinctive, methodical treatment approach. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 150 patients with obstetric hemorrhage. Clinical information, including bleeding volume, hemorrhage etiology, therapeutic intervention, transfusion quantity, patient outcome, and CE-dCT findings, were explored. Results: The leading cause of obstetric hemorrhage was atonic bleeding (55%), followed by vaginal hematoma (13%) and retained placenta (11%). The median amount of bleeding was 2,803 mL, and the median volume of red blood cells (RBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) required was 6 units. Blood loss and transfusion volume were similar regardless of the cause of obstetric hemorrhage. Conservative management, such as uterotonics or balloon tamponade, achieved hemostasis in 57% of patients, whereas 43% required invasive interventions, such as transcatheter arterial embolization. CE-dCT was performed on 85% of patients, and extravasation was detected in 53%. Moreover, "PRACE," characterized by Postpartum hemorrhage, Resistance to treatment, and Arterial Contrast Extravasation on CE-dCT scans, potentially requires massive blood transfusions and invasive treatment. Conclusions: Although obstetric hemorrhage encompasses a diverse array of pathologies, medical practitioners must recognize that approximately 3,000 mL of blood is lost and at least 6 units of RBC and FFP are required, irrespective of the cause. CE-dCT plays a pivotal role in elucidating the etiology of obstetric hemorrhage and guiding therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

atonic bleedingballoon tamponadecontrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomographyobstetric hemorrhagetranscatheter arterial embolization

Identifiers

PMID39926097
PMCPMC11799725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.