Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926089›Full record

ReviewJMA journal2025

Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Current State and Future Challenges.

Shintaro Arakaki, Shin Takenaka, Kimimasa Sasaki, Daichi Kitaguchi, Hiro Hasegawa, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Mitsuhisa Takatsuki, Masaaki Ito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Minimally invasive liver resection-New techniques].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shintaro ArakakiDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Shin TakenakaDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Kimimasa SasakiDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Daichi KitaguchiDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Hiro HasegawaDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Nobuyoshi TakeshitaDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Mitsuhisa TakatsukiDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Japan.
Masaaki ItoDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have markedly affected various fields, with notable progress in surgery. This study explores the integration of AI in surgery, particularly focusing on minimally invasive surgery (MIS), where high-quality surgical videos provide fertile ground for computer vision (CV) technology applications. CV plays an important role in enhancing intraoperative decision-making through real-time image recognition. This study considers the challenges in clinical applications and future perspectives by reviewing the current state of AI in navigation during surgery, postoperative analysis, and automated surgical skill assessment.

Indexed as

AICSArtificial IntelligenceAutomated Surgical Skill EvaluationComputer-Assisted SurgeryComputer VisionDeep LearningMachine LearningSurgery

Identifiers

PMID39926089
PMCPMC11799540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.