Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926081›Full record

ReviewJMA journal2025

AI in Echocardiography: State-of-the-art Automated Measurement Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Yukina Hirata, Kenya Kusunose

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yukina HirataUltrasound Examination Center, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Kenya KusunoseDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nephrology, and Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The artificial intelligence (AI) technology in automated measurements has seen remarkable advancements across various vendors, thereby offering new opportunities in echocardiography. Fully automated software particularly has the potential to elevate the analysis and the interpretation of medical images to a new level compared to previous algorithms. Tasks that traditionally required significant time, such as ventricular and atrial volume measurements and Doppler tracing, can now be performed swiftly through AI's automated phase setting and waveform tracing capabilities. The benefits of AI-driven systems include high-precision and reliable measurements, significant time savings, and enhanced workflow efficiency. By automating routine tasks, AI can reduce the burden on clinicians, allowing them to gather additional information, perform additional tests, and improve patient care. While many studies confirm the accuracy and the reproducibility of AI-driven techniques, it is crucial for clinicians to verify AI-generated measurements and ensure high-quality imaging and Doppler waveforms to fully take advantage of the benefits from these technologies. This review discusses the current state of AI-driven automated measurements in echocardiography, their impact on clinical practice, and the strategies required for the effective integration of AI into clinical workflows.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomated measurementsdeep learningechocardiography

Identifiers

PMID39926081
PMCPMC11799715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.