ReviewJMA journal2025
Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy Practice in Japan.
Review in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical artificial intelligence (AI) in Japan: Regulatory pathways, domain-specific evidence, and its data infrastructure from an international perspective.Global health & medicine · 2026Review
- [Clinical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: A Human-Artificial Intelligence Interaction Perspective].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026Review
- Could artificial intelligence-powered colonoscopies change the future of colorectal cancer screening?World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- [Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Quality of Colonoscopy].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Review
- AI Era Is Coming: The Implementation of AI Medical Devices to Endoscopy.JMA journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review outlines the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) into colonoscopy procedures which includes its history, processes, and challenges. We highlight the importance of the collaborative effort between medical and computer science researchers in the development of AI tools in colonoscopy, particularly focusing on the roles of computer-aided detection (CADe) and computer-aided characterization (CADx) in a real time analysis of colonoscopy videos. Some of the proposed technologies are considered to improve the important clinical outcomes of patients such as adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy. Regulatory approval is considered mandatory before introducing AI tools into the market owing to the potential risks associated with the introduction of AI tools in healthcare. We share the experience of obtaining regulatory approval for EndoBRAIN in Japan, emphasizing the challenges in establishing examination criteria and performance levels at the period. Reimbursement is also identified as necessary for the widespread adoption of medical innovation. With the introduction of reimbursement for a CADe tool in Japan in 2024, we expect to accelerate implementation of AI in colonoscopy in general. Despite regulatory approval and reimbursement, concerns are raised with regard to the assessment of the balance between benefits and harms of AI in colonoscopy. Questions about its impact on cancer prevention, healthcare burden, patient acceptance, and effectiveness across different populations remain unsolved. The lack of clinical guidelines for AI in colonoscopy emphasizes the need for a rigorous assessment of available evidence in optimizing the adoption of AI in colonoscopy practice. While it is always exciting to strive for medical innovation, ensuring rigorous evaluation to optimize patient care is mandatory to improve the quality of health and society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.