Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926071›Full record

ReviewJMA journal2025

Artificial Intelligence for Patient Safety and Surgical Education in Neurosurgery.

Taku Sugiyama, Hiroyuki Sugimori, Minghui Tang, Miki Fujimura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taku SugiyamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroyuki SugimoriMedical AI Research and Development Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Minghui TangMedical AI Research and Development Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Miki FujimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurosurgery has evolved alongside technological innovations; however, these advances have also introduced greater complexity into clinical practice. Neurosurgery remains a demanding and high-risk field that requires a broad range of skills. Artificial intelligence (AI) has immense potential in neurosurgery given its ability to rapidly analyze large volumes of clinical data generated in modern clinical environments. An expanding body of literature has demonstrated that AI enhances various aspects of neurosurgery, including diagnostics, prognostication, decision-making, data management, education, and clinical studies. AI applications are expected to reduce medical errors and costs, broaden healthcare accessibility, and ultimately boost patient safety and surgical education. Nevertheless, AI application in neurosurgery remains practically limited because of several challenges, such as the diversity and volume of clinical training data collection, concerns regarding data quality, algorithmic bias, transparency (explainability and interpretability), ethical issues, and regulatory implications. To comprehensively discuss the potential benefits, future directions, and limitations of AI in neurosurgery, this review examined recent studies on AI technology and its applications in this field, focusing on intraoperative decision support and surgical education.

Indexed as

AIcomputer visiondeep learningmachine learningmicrosurgerysurgical skill

Identifiers

PMID39926071
PMCPMC11799567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.