ReviewJMA journal2025
Artificial Intelligence for Patient Safety and Surgical Education in Neurosurgery.
Review in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence models in the surgical planning of low-grade gliomas: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the Performance and Fragility of Large Language Models on the Self-Assessment for Neurological Surgeons.Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- ChatNSG: An Overview of Contemporary and Emerging Artificial Intelligence Models for the Neurosurgeon.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
- Towards measuring the challenge: a narrative review on existing concepts and parallels for surgical struggle.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Gamifying motor recovery: virtual reality as a therapeutic ally in pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-integrated video analysis of vessel area changes and instrument motion for microsurgical skill assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rapidly Rising Preference among New-entry Medical Students for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Reflective Reports.JMA journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurosurgery has evolved alongside technological innovations; however, these advances have also introduced greater complexity into clinical practice. Neurosurgery remains a demanding and high-risk field that requires a broad range of skills. Artificial intelligence (AI) has immense potential in neurosurgery given its ability to rapidly analyze large volumes of clinical data generated in modern clinical environments. An expanding body of literature has demonstrated that AI enhances various aspects of neurosurgery, including diagnostics, prognostication, decision-making, data management, education, and clinical studies. AI applications are expected to reduce medical errors and costs, broaden healthcare accessibility, and ultimately boost patient safety and surgical education. Nevertheless, AI application in neurosurgery remains practically limited because of several challenges, such as the diversity and volume of clinical training data collection, concerns regarding data quality, algorithmic bias, transparency (explainability and interpretability), ethical issues, and regulatory implications. To comprehensively discuss the potential benefits, future directions, and limitations of AI in neurosurgery, this review examined recent studies on AI technology and its applications in this field, focusing on intraoperative decision support and surgical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.