Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39926035›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Closing the gap while standing still: clinimetric properties of a low-cost balance platform and a user-friendly app for posturography.

Tom Vredeveld, John F Stins, Annelies J van Vliet, Vincent C M Tuinder, Stephan P J Ramaekers, Michel W Coppieters, Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Test-Retest Reliability of Postural Sway Measures Using a Portable Low-Cost Force Plate in Healthy Adults.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tom VredeveldCentre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
John F StinsDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Annelies J van VlietDepartment of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Technology, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Vincent C M TuinderDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Stephan P J RamaekersCentre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Michel W CoppietersDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Annelies L Pool-GoudzwaardDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Wii Balance Board (WBB) is used as a rehabilitation tool for balance or strength interventions and posturography in balance tasks. Nonetheless, implementation of posturography using the WBB in a clinical setting is hampered by required technical skills for signal processing to obtain meaningful balance measures. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of a WBB to measure center of pressure (COP) parameters and to provide an easy-to-use web application to improve implementation of posturography in clinical practice. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out including 30 healthy adults who performed repeated balance tasks including single and double leg standing still with eyes open or eyes closed. A WBB on top of a laboratory-grade force plate synchronously measured COP. Parameters based on COP displacement were calculated, including standard deviation of displacement, velocity, pathlength and 95% predicted ellipse area. Results: The concurrent validity of the WBB to measure COP in quiet standing still tasks was excellent for all parameters (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) > 0.900, Conclusion: The WBB revealed excellent concurrent validity with a laboratory-grade force plate for balance tasks on a single leg or two legs for most COP parameters. The reliability was poor to moderate for most tasks, however comparable to the findings from the laboratory grade force plate. An open-source web application, employing R Shiny, was created to provide a tool to analyse COP parameters. Hereby, it was demonstrated that open-source scientific tools may help researchers to bridge the gap between scientific findings and clinical use of posturography.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPostural BalanceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsStanding PositionYoung AdultBalanceCenter of pressureForce platformOpen source applicationPostural controlPosturographyReliability and validityReproducibility of resultsSensors

Identifiers

PMID39926035
PMCPMC11804768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.