Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925951›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2025

Low-dose Oral Misoprostol after Cervical Ripening with a Double-balloon Catheter: 25 µg or 50 µg?

Sven Kehl, Zeynep Selen Karademir, Christel Weiss, Adriana Titzmann, Michael Schneider, Matthias W Beckmann, Simon Bader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sven KehlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2220-371X
Zeynep Selen KarademirDepartment of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Christel WeissDepartment of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Adriana TitzmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Michael SchneiderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias W BeckmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Simon BaderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Misoprostol is used in low doses for the induction of labor. It is still not clear, however, which of the approved doses (25 µg or 50 µg) is more beneficial. The aim of this study was to investigate whether oral misoprostol at a dose of 25 µg or at a dose of 50 µg should be preferred to induce labor after cervical ripening with a double-balloon catheter. Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed full-term pregnancies (≥ 37 + 0 GW) in which sequential induction of labor was carried out using a double-balloon catheter followed by oral administration of misoprostol. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 received 50 µg misoprostol every four hours and Group 2 received 25 µg misoprostol every two hours. The primary target parameter was the rate of caesarean sections. Secondary target parameters included the interval from induction to delivery, the rate of spontaneous births, vaginal operative deliveries, and neonatal outcomes. Results: 967 patients were included in the study: 514 in Group 1 and 453 in Group 2. There was no significant difference in the rate of caesarean sections between the two groups (p = 0.688). However, significantly more women in Group 2 had unsuccessful induction of labor, defined as a vaginal birth after 72 hours (15.8% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.001). But fewer neonates from Group 2 required transfer to the neonatal department (10.6% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The study found no difference in the rate of caesarean sections for the different doses of misoprostol. However the rate of vaginal deliveries only occurring after 72 hours was higher in the group treated with 25 µg misoprostol, while more neonates required transfer to the neonatal department in the group receiving 50 µg misoprostol.

Indexed as

caesarean sectiondouble-balloon cervical ripening catheterinduction of labormisoprostolneonatal outcome

Identifiers

PMID39925951
PMCPMC11802198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.