Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925929›Full record

ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025

Development and Validation of a Cost-Effective Machine Learning Model for Screening Potential Rheumatoid Arthritis in Primary Healthcare Clinics.

Wenqi Wu, Xiaohao Hu, Linyang Yan, Zhiyin Li, Bo Li, Xinpeng Chen, Zexun Lin, Huiqiong Zeng, Chun Li, Yingqian Mo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wenqi Wu *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Xiaohao Hu *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Linyang Yan *Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasonic Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, Shenzhen, 518036, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyin LiDepartment of Information Systems, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Bo LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, People's Hospital of Longhua District, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Xinpeng ChenDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shenzhen Futian Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Zexun LinShenzhen Nanshan Medical Group HQ Taohuayuan Community Health Service Center, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-2981-1409
Huiqiong ZengTraditional Chinese Medicine Department of Rheumatism, Women & Children Health Institute, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Chun LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yingqian MoDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yalin WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasonic Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, Shenzhen, 518036, People's Republic of China.
Qingwen WangDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In primary healthcare, diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is challenging due to a general lack of in-depth knowledge of RA by general practitioners (GPs) and the lack of effective tools, leading to high rates of missed diagnosis. This study focuses on a screening model for primary healthcare, aiming to improve early RA screening accuracy and efficiency at a relatively lower cost, reducing delays in GPs' recognition of RA. Methods: We randomly selected 2106 participants from the RA group or combined control group (comprising healthy individuals and patients with non-RA rheumatic diseases) at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital as the developing cohort. Guided by experienced rheumatologists, we built a comprehensive database with 26 clinical features. Using 10 classical machine learning algorithms, we developed screening models. Evaluation metrics determined the best model. Employing multivariatelogistic regression results and the best-performing model to identify the least costly features, ensuring applicability in primary healthcare clinics. Subsequently, we retrained and validated our proposed model based on two primary healthcare validation cohorts. Results: In experiments, the algorithms achieved over 88% accuracy on training and test sets. Random Forest (RF) excelled with 96.20% (95% CI 95.39% to 97.02%) accuracy, 96.22% (95% CI 95.40% to 97.03%) specificity, 96.18% (95% CI 95.37% to 97.00%) sensitivity, and 96.20% (95% CI 95.39% to 97.02%) Areas Under Curves (AUC). A meticulous feature selection identified 11 key features for RA screening. In an external test on two primary healthcare datasets with these features, RF demonstrated an accuracy of 88.435% (95% CI 85.55% to 91.32%), sensitivity of 98.55% (95% CI 97.47% to 99.63%), specificity of 85.56% (95% CI 82.39% to 88.73%), and an AUC of 92.055% (95% CI 89.62% to 94.49%). Conclusion: The screening model excels in automating prompt identification of RA in primary healthcare, improving the early detection of RA, and reducing delays and associated costs. Our findings contribute positively and are poised to elevate prospective RA management, fostering improvements in healthcare sector responsiveness and resource efficiency.

Indexed as

machine learningprimary health carerheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID39925929
PMCPMC11804240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.