ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Development and Validation of a Cost-Effective Machine Learning Model for Screening Potential Rheumatoid Arthritis in Primary Healthcare Clinics.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable machine learning revealing the impact of mental and physical health on arthritis.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Primary Health Care: The Research Landscape.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Current application, possibilities, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Review
- Fuzzy evaluation and explainable machine learning for diagnosis of rheumatic and autoimmune diseases.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In primary healthcare, diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is challenging due to a general lack of in-depth knowledge of RA by general practitioners (GPs) and the lack of effective tools, leading to high rates of missed diagnosis. This study focuses on a screening model for primary healthcare, aiming to improve early RA screening accuracy and efficiency at a relatively lower cost, reducing delays in GPs' recognition of RA. Methods: We randomly selected 2106 participants from the RA group or combined control group (comprising healthy individuals and patients with non-RA rheumatic diseases) at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital as the developing cohort. Guided by experienced rheumatologists, we built a comprehensive database with 26 clinical features. Using 10 classical machine learning algorithms, we developed screening models. Evaluation metrics determined the best model. Employing multivariatelogistic regression results and the best-performing model to identify the least costly features, ensuring applicability in primary healthcare clinics. Subsequently, we retrained and validated our proposed model based on two primary healthcare validation cohorts. Results: In experiments, the algorithms achieved over 88% accuracy on training and test sets. Random Forest (RF) excelled with 96.20% (95% CI 95.39% to 97.02%) accuracy, 96.22% (95% CI 95.40% to 97.03%) specificity, 96.18% (95% CI 95.37% to 97.00%) sensitivity, and 96.20% (95% CI 95.39% to 97.02%) Areas Under Curves (AUC). A meticulous feature selection identified 11 key features for RA screening. In an external test on two primary healthcare datasets with these features, RF demonstrated an accuracy of 88.435% (95% CI 85.55% to 91.32%), sensitivity of 98.55% (95% CI 97.47% to 99.63%), specificity of 85.56% (95% CI 82.39% to 88.73%), and an AUC of 92.055% (95% CI 89.62% to 94.49%). Conclusion: The screening model excels in automating prompt identification of RA in primary healthcare, improving the early detection of RA, and reducing delays and associated costs. Our findings contribute positively and are poised to elevate prospective RA management, fostering improvements in healthcare sector responsiveness and resource efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.