Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925825›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2024

Nanoparticle accumulation and penetration in 3D tumor models: the effect of size, shape, and surface charge.

Pierre Cybulski, Maria Bravo, Jim Jui-Kai Chen, Indra Van Zundert, Sandra Krzyzowska, Farsai Taemaitree, Hiroshi Uji-I, Johan Hofkens, Susana Rocha, Beatrice Fortuni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Structure-Selective Polydopamine Coating on Drug Nanoparticles.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. How Key in vivo Models Can Advance Anticancer Nanotherapeutics.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pierre CybulskiMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Maria BravoMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jim Jui-Kai ChenMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Indra Van ZundertMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sandra KrzyzowskaMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Farsai TaemaitreeResearch Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroshi Uji-IMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johan HofkensMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Susana RochaMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Beatrice FortuniMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical studies have demonstrated that nanoparticles (NPs) hold significant potential for advancing cancer therapy by enhancing therapeutic efficacy while reducing side effects. Their effectiveness in solid tumors is, however, often constrained by insufficient accumulation and penetration. Understanding how the physicochemical properties of NPs - such as size, shape, and surface charge - influence their interaction with cells within the tumor is critical for optimizing NP design. In this study, we addressed the challenge of inconsistent NP behavior by systematically evaluating NP uptake in both 2D and 3D tumor models, and NP penetration in spheroids. Our results showed that larger NPs exhibited higher internalization rates in 2D models but limited penetration in 3D spheroids. Furthermore, negatively charged NPs consistently achieved superior accumulation and deeper penetration than neutral and positively charged NPs. Spherical NPs outperformed rod-shaped NPs in tumor accumulation and penetration. These findings underscore the importance of carefully tailoring NP properties to the complex tumor microenvironment for improved therapeutic outcomes in real tumors.

Indexed as

3D cell modelsnanoparticlesnanoparticle shapenanoparticle sizenanoparticle surface chargenanoparticle uptakespheroid modelstumor penetration and accumulation

Identifiers

PMID39925825
PMCPMC11802510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.