Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925781›Full record

ArticleBiology methods & protocols2025

An improved cell nuclear isolation method.

Pengfei Li, Jingyao Zhang, Xiaojuan Liu, Zhijuan Wu, Y James Kang, Wenjing Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pengfei LiRegenerative Medicine Research Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China.
Jingyao ZhangCore Facilities of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Xiaojuan LiuRegenerative Medicine Research Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zhijuan WuKey Laboratory of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Animal Genetic Resource Reservation and Utilization, Sichuan Province and Ministry of Education, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Y James KangRegenerative Medicine Research Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China.
Wenjing ZhangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6694-6072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear isolation is crucial for studying gene expression and regulatory mechanisms in eukaryotic cells. This study aimed to improve nuclear isolation and compare the yield, purity, and efficiency of several methods. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were used to evaluate four different techniques: sucrose centrifugation, a simplified method, homogenization, and the NE-PER kit. For sucrose centrifugation, cells were scraped in Tween buffer, washed with sucrose buffer, and homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer. The pellet was washed with glycerol buffer to isolate the nuclei. In the simplified method, cells were scraped in scraping buffer, washed with sucrose buffer, and the pellet was washed with glycerol buffer to isolate the nuclei. For homogenization, cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline, followed by two washes in extract buffer and lysed with 10 strokes in a Kontes Dounce homogenizer. The NE-PER kit was used according to the manufacturer's protocol. Nuclei isolated by each method were tested by immunoblotting, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), and chromatin immunoprecipitation (Ch-IP) assays. The simplified method produced nuclei with fewer organelles and less cytoplasm than those isolated by homogenization or the NE-PER kit. It was similarly effective as sucrose centrifugation but faster. Co-IP and Ch-IP assays confirmed that the simplified method enriched target proteins and DNA fragments. Overall, the simplified method provides a highly pure nuclear sample optimal for downstream applications requiring purified nuclei.

Indexed as

cell nuclear isolationchromatin immunoprecipitationco-immunoprecipitation

Identifiers

PMID39925781
PMCPMC11805344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.