ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Characterizing acetabular defects and need of major reconstruction during total hip arthroplasty in patients with acetabular protrusion- a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with acetabular protrusion can be challenging due to the lack of acetabular bone support. Some patients may require a major reconstructive procedure to aid in the fixation of the acetabular components. The purpose of the study was to characterize the type of acetabular defects in patients with protrusion and to assess the need for major reconstruction. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 125 THAs performed at a single tertiary center from 2010 to 2020 by a single surgeon in patients with acetabular protrusion. Demographics, operative details and radiographic details were recorded. THAs in which a structural graft, cage or augment were used for acetabular reconstruction were considered to have undergone a major reconstructive procedure and a classification system was proposed to identify patients requiring major reconstruction. Results: 10 (8 %) THAs required a major reconstruction in our cohort (2- augment, 8- structural allograft. There was significant difference in acetabular defects based on the etiology. Major reconstruction was more common when the diagnosis was sequalae of tuberculosis or post-traumatic arthritis. Simple cavitatory defects seldom required a major reconstruction while combined defects and medial wall deficiency increased the risk of requiring a major reconstruction. Conclusion: The severity of defects varied considerably with majority of patients having cavitatory type of defect which can be successfully managed without the need of any major reconstructive measures. A simple classification based on the type of defect and medial wall competency appeared to be useful in identifying patients who may need a major reconstructive procedure during THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.