ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Stochasticity as a solution for overfitting-A new model and comparative study on non-invasive EEG prospects.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time-frequency-spatial channel attention network for semantic decoding: an exploratory EEG study.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The potential and utility of inner speech is pivotal for developing practical, everyday Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) applications, as it represents a type of brain signal that operates independently of external stimuli however it is largely underdeveloped due to the challenges faced in deciphering its signals. In this study, we evaluated the behaviors of various Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models on a publicly available dataset, employing popular preprocessing methods as feature extractors to enhance model training. We face significant challenges like subject-dependent variability, high noise levels, and overfitting. To address overfitting in particular, we propose using "BruteExtraTree": a new classifier which relies on moderate stochasticity inherited from its base model, the ExtraTreeClassifier. This model not only matches the best DL model, ShallowFBCSPNet, in the subject-independent scenario in our experiments scoring 32% accuracy, but also surpasses the state-of-the-art by achieving 46.6% average per-subject accuracy in the subject-dependent case. Our results on the subject-dependent case show promise on the possibility of a new paradigm for using inner speech data inspired from LLM pretraining but we also highlight the crucial need for a drastic change in data recording or noise removal methods to open the way for more practical accuracies in the subject-independent case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.