ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2024
Establishing a Standard Transverse Maxillary Dimension on Study Casts Using the Intermolar-to-Intercanine Width Ratio: A Pan-India Study.
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evaluation of maxillary width holds significant clinical importance in identifying developmental abnormalities, aiding in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, providing ethnicity-specific data, and supporting forensic applications. Still, research on maxillary growth in transverse dimension is limited due to a lack of standardized diagnostic criteria and methods for defining normalcy. Addressing these gaps, this study aimed to establish a standard transverse maxillary dimension using the intermolar (IMW)-to-intercanine (ICW) width ratio determined on a large, homogeneous sample of dental Class I well-aligned arches with Little's irregularity index 1 or 2 across India. Methods: A pan-India, cross-sectional, model-based study of 1575 maxillary arch models with normal occlusion was conducted to define the transverse dimension of the maxillary arch. The IMW and the ICW linear dimensions and their ratio were measured and statistically analyzed. These parameters were also compared for sex-based differences. Results: The results revealed a mean IMW and ICW of 36.87mm and 35.44 mm, respectively. The mean ratio of IMW to ICW was 1.04. Sexual differentiation revealed a significantly higher mean values of IMW (37.54) and ICW (36.10) in males compared to females for IMW (35.84) and ICW (34.92), respectively, at p=0.000. Conclusion: In normal and well-aligned dentition, the ratio between IMW and ICW in the transverse dimension is 1.04:1. It provides a clinically easy visual evaluation chairside method to identify normal arches, even without radiographs. This norm can be further explored in diverse ethnic populations and explored for applications in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, forensic odontology, and anthropological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.