Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925692›Full record

ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2024

Establishing a Standard Transverse Maxillary Dimension on Study Casts Using the Intermolar-to-Intercanine Width Ratio: A Pan-India Study.

Alka Banker, Dolly Patel, Wasundhara Bhad, Sarala Manjappa Laxmikanth, Priyanka Kapoor, Aman Chowdhry, Jayasankar Purushothaman Pillai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alka BankerBankers Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8446-8011
Dolly PatelDepartment of Orthodontics, AMC Dental College, Kokhra, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1490-656X
Wasundhara BhadGovernment Dental College & Hospital Mumbai, St. George Hospital Premise, P.D. Melo Road Fort, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7908-9199
Sarala Manjappa LaxmikanthDepartment of Orthodontics, the Oxford Dental College, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8290-8918
Priyanka KapoorOrthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7676-9743
Aman ChowdhryOral Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6243-4152
Jayasankar Purushothaman PillaiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-7531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of maxillary width holds significant clinical importance in identifying developmental abnormalities, aiding in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, providing ethnicity-specific data, and supporting forensic applications. Still, research on maxillary growth in transverse dimension is limited due to a lack of standardized diagnostic criteria and methods for defining normalcy. Addressing these gaps, this study aimed to establish a standard transverse maxillary dimension using the intermolar (IMW)-to-intercanine (ICW) width ratio determined on a large, homogeneous sample of dental Class I well-aligned arches with Little's irregularity index 1 or 2 across India. Methods: A pan-India, cross-sectional, model-based study of 1575 maxillary arch models with normal occlusion was conducted to define the transverse dimension of the maxillary arch. The IMW and the ICW linear dimensions and their ratio were measured and statistically analyzed. These parameters were also compared for sex-based differences. Results: The results revealed a mean IMW and ICW of 36.87mm and 35.44 mm, respectively. The mean ratio of IMW to ICW was 1.04. Sexual differentiation revealed a significantly higher mean values of IMW (37.54) and ICW (36.10) in males compared to females for IMW (35.84) and ICW (34.92), respectively, at p=0.000. Conclusion: In normal and well-aligned dentition, the ratio between IMW and ICW in the transverse dimension is 1.04:1. It provides a clinically easy visual evaluation chairside method to identify normal arches, even without radiographs. This norm can be further explored in diverse ethnic populations and explored for applications in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, forensic odontology, and anthropological studies.

Indexed as

Inter-canine distanceInter-molar distanceJaw AbnormalitiesMaxillaMaxillary widthMeSH terms: Maxillofacial DevelopmentReference StandardsTransverse dimensionTransverse norm

Identifiers

PMID39925692
PMCPMC11801264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.