Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925690›Full record

ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2024

Influence of Different Enamel Pretreatment on Bond Strength of Fissure Sealant.

Dafina Doberdoli, Hrvoje Jurić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dafina DoberdoliUniversity of Dentistry Clinical Center of Kosovo, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Pristina, Kosovo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0362-1104
Hrvoje JurićUniversity of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-8706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this Materials and Methods: Forty-two healthy molars and premolars were collected for this study and randomly divided into 6 groups (n=7). Group 1: Quantum Square Pulse (QSP); Group 2: Medium-Short Pulse (MSP) mode; Group 3: Super Short Pulse (SSP) mode; Group 4: QSP + acid etching; Group 5: MSP + acid etching; Group 6: SSP + acid etching. The occlusal surfaces of the teeth were pre-treated according to the defined group. Laser conditioning of the enamel was performed using an Er:YAG laser Fotona Light Walker AT-S (Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia) with a wavelength of 2940 nm + acid etching (EN etch Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Occlusal surfaces were sealed with a resin-based composite fissure sealant (Helioseal F, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) test and stereomicroscope evaluations of the failure mode were performed. The μTBS was tested using the Games-Howell method. The failure mode between groups was tested using the chi-square test. The significance level for all tests was set at p <0.05. Results: The highest bond strength was measured using laser etching in MSP mode combined with acid etching (36.09 MPa). This combination showed a significantly higher bond strength than the other combinations (SSP + ETCH, p<0.001; QSP + ETCH, p<0.001). Conclusion: The SP laser followed by acid etching of enamel yielded the highest bond strength. Thus, the MSP with a 140 µs pulse mode might be the preferred choice as a pre-treatment procedure for fissure sealing.

Indexed as

Bond strengthBond StrengthComposite fissure sealantComposite ResinsEnamel pre-treatmentEr: YAG laserLaser TherapyMeSH terms: Dental EnamelPit and Fissure Sealants

Identifiers

PMID39925690
PMCPMC11801265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.