Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925685›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Application of deconvolutional networks for feature interpretability in epilepsy detection.

Sihao Shao, Yu Zhou, Ruiheng Wu, Aiping Yang, Qiang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sihao Shao *School of Microelectronics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yu Zhou *College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Ruiheng WuDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Aiping YangSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Qiang LiSchool of Microelectronics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Scalp electroencephalography (EEG) is commonly used to assist in epilepsy detection. Even automated detection algorithms are already available to assist clinicians in reviewing EEG data, many algorithms used for seizure detection in epilepsy fail to account for the contributions of different channels. The Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) can provide the model's interpretability but has not been applied in seizure detection. Methods: To address these challenges, a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) model, combining SE (Squeeze-and-Excitation) modules, was proposed on top of the FCN. The epilepsy detection performance for patient-independent was evaluated on the CHB-MIT dataset. Then, the SE module was removed from the model and integrated the model with Inception, ResNet, and CBAM modules separately. Results: The method showed superior advancement, stability, and reliability compared to the other three methods. The method demonstrated a G-Mean of 82.7% for sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) on the CHB-MIT dataset. In addition, The contributions of each channel to the seizure detection task have also been quantified, which led us to find that the FZ, CZ, PZ, FT9, FT10, and T8 brain regions have a more pronounced impact on epileptic seizures. Discussion: This article presents a novel algorithm for epilepsy detection that accurately identifies seizures in different patients and enhances the model's interpretability.

Indexed as

deconvolution networkdeep learningEEGinterpretability analysisseizure detection

Identifiers

PMID39925685
PMCPMC11802560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.